Plus: Aurora’s AV freight revenue debut, a $4.25M facial monitoring settlement, the U.S. trade gap hits lowest point since September 2023, and more.
Lytx and Maverick Transportation reached a $4.25 million settlement in an Illinois biometric privacy case, with nearly 3,600 drivers receiving $650 to $850 each under the state’s strict BIPA law.
Aurora logged its first revenue in Q2 2025, expanded driverless trucking to nighttime operations, and grew its network, even as losses topped $200 million and safety concerns.
Lytx and Maverick Transportation reached a $4.25 million settlement in an Illinois biometric privacy case, with nearly 3,600 drivers receiving $650 to $850 each under the state’s strict BIPA law.
A federal judge has approved a $4.25 million settlement in a closely watched case involving in‑cab video company Lytx and Illinois’ strict biometric privacy law. The settlement concludes litigation that began in 2021 and will result in payouts of roughly $650 to $850 per driver, depending on residency.
The lawsuit was filed by truck driver Joshua Lewis in 2021 against his employer, Maverick Transportation, and Lytx. It alleged that Lytx’s in‑cab video technology violated Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) by scanning drivers’ facial geometry without adequate notice or retention policies.
According to the original complaint, Lytx’s system would “scan the driver’s face geometry and harness those biometric data points by feeding them into sophisticated algorithms that identify the driver’s actions, in what amounts to constant AI surveillance.”
The $4.25 million settlement will be distributed as follows:
The settlement amount is significantly higher than payouts in other BIPA class actions, which have ranged between $47 and $188 per individual. By comparison, a separate transportation-related BIPA case against railroad BNSF resulted in payouts of about $1,000 per driver.
Lytx continues to dispute that its technology falls under BIPA.
“Lytx firmly believes that BIPA does not apply to Lytx’s technology and that these lawsuits are not warranted,” the company said in a statement to FreightWaves. “As designed, Lytx’s in‑vehicle Machine Vision + Artificial Intelligence (‘MV+AI’) Alerting System does not collect retina or iris scans, facial geometry, or any type of biometric data, for any purpose whatsoever.”
The company added it was “pleased to put this settlement behind us” and emphasized its focus on delivering “category-defining driver safety technology.”
Although the case was settled, the lawsuit highlighted the risks companies face under Illinois’ BIPA, considered one of the toughest biometric privacy laws in the U.S.
A blog post from law firm Milberg Coleman Bryson Phillips Grossman, which represented the plaintiffs, noted the case’s broader significance:
“In denying dismissal, the court reinforced a key feature of BIPA: the law’s protections apply regardless of whether biometric data is used for actual identification. That interpretation continues to drive litigation risk for companies deploying biometric and AI technologies in Illinois.”
The settlement resolves the claims without a trial, leaving unresolved the question of whether Lytx’s in‑cab technology constitutes a BIPA violation.
Source: FreightWaves
A Fifth Circuit case involving Penske could deepen the legal divide over broker liability, increasing pressure for a Supreme Court ruling under the F4A safety exemption.
Sixth Circuit ruling in Cox v. TQL deepens legal split on broker liability under F4A
C.H. Robinson urges Supreme Court to affirm federal preemption of state negligent selection claims, reinforcing protections for brokers under the F4A.
Texas Supreme Court reverses $100 million verdict against Werner, ruling the carrier wasn’t liable in 2014 crash caused by out-of-control pickup.
Join over 12K+ subscribers to get the latest freight news and entertainment directly in your inbox for free. Subscribe & be sure to check your inbox to confirm (and your spam folder just in case).
