Two bills just dropped in the Senate that could reshape trucking faster than anything since deregulation. Plus: Russian hackers targeted your load board, flatbed rejection rates just hit 40%, and a robot is taking the Houston-Dallas overnight run.
This week: The Dalilah Law, a trucking bankruptcy that wiped out thousands overnight, a FreightGuard civil war on Reddit, and the payroll data that's predicting Q4 capacity.
Indiana pulled the trigger on carriers employing illegal CDL holders. Plus: tariff ruling could flood LA with imports, DC finally moves on double brokers, spot rates are outrunning contract, and more.
MyCarrier and project44's court battle over contract terms intensifies, with both FreightTech companies defending their business models in a high-stakes legal dispute.
In a brewing legal battle, FreightTech powerhouses MyCarrier and project44 are fighting in Delaware Chancery Court over a contract dispute that could reshape their business relationship.
MyCarrier and project44 are fighting in court over p44’s threats to shut off MyCarrier’s APIs due to what it says are violations of the No Build-Behind Restrictions in the companies’ 2023 services agreement.
— John Paul Hampstead (@JPHampstead) August 8, 2024
In 2023, MyCarrier and project44 signed a lucrative agreement with project44 providing API and visibility services to MyCarrier’s LTL platform. The agreement included a crucial “No Build-Behind” clause—MyCarrier wasn’t supposed to create competing products.
But in June 2024, project44 accused MyCarrier of violating this clause by developing a stand-alone eBoL product. MyCarrier denied the claims, asserting that their eBoL was integrated into existing systems, not a separate product. When project44 threatened to cut off services, MyCarrier responded with legal action.
On June 30, MyCarrier filed for a temporary restraining order to stop project44 from suspending services, claiming that a cutoff would cause "irreparable harm" to its operations. Project44 countered, arguing MyCarrier was secretly developing competitive technology in bad faith, demanding immediate discovery to uncover the truth.
MyCarrier: The company emphasized its commitment to its partners, stating:
“MyCarrier always has and will continue to operate in a collaborative and open manner.”
Project44: General Counsel Jennifer Coyne expressed that project44 only sought to enforce its contractual rights without disrupting service.
The court did not grant MyCarrier’s restraining order request but has ordered both parties to begin a formal discovery process. This story is still developing, but the aftermath will play a huge role for companies seeking similar agreements and regulations in the future within the freight tech industry.
Source: Freight Waves | John Paul Hampstead/X
Harish Abbott, CEO of Augment, shares why the future of freight is already here and how to adapt to it.
Our trip to San Francisco started with a DM. TruckSmarter’s CEO, Daniel Kao, asked us to partner on their biggest launch yet, a driver-first product backed by $16M in fresh investment.
Plus: backlash over carrier safety rankings, the Port of LA’s push toward 10M TEUs, states expanding ICE enforcement, and more in today’s newsletter.
Why most freight AI projects won’t survive 2026. Learn the automation risks teams face and how reliable, scalable workflows prevent failure.
Join over 14K+ subscribers to get the latest freight news and entertainment directly in your inbox for free. Subscribe & be sure to check your inbox to confirm (and your spam folder just in case).
