Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern Defend Merger as Rivals Build Alliances

Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern say rival alliances prove their merger will strengthen competition, as CSX and CN tout new intermodal services linking Canada’s West Coast to Nashville.

Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern Defend Merger as Rivals Build Alliances
Image Source: CSX/LinkedIn

Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern are pressing their case for a merger, arguing that rival partnerships announced by other Class I railroads only presses the need for a permanent consolidation.

At the Morgan Stanley Laguna Conference, NS Chief Financial Officer Mark George said: “Just the mere idea of having a transcontinental railroad has already enhanced competition … And I think that’s a very, very important point. Our argument is being made for us.”

Rival Partnerships Expand Options

In recent weeks, competing carriers have unveiled new alliances that provide shippers with coast-to-coast service without requiring a merger.

  • BNSF and CSX announced an intermodal partnership offering seamless domestic service across the country and new international connections linking Kansas City with East Coast ports.
  • CSX and Canadian National (CN) introduced a new interline service from Canada’s West Coast to Nashville, Tennessee, via Memphis. CSX highlighted the benefits of replacing the trucking leg with a steel-wheel interchange, saying the move will reduce highway congestion while improving speed and reliability. “At CSX, we’re committed to working with our interchange partners to create solutions that deliver mutual value and expand the options available to customers,” said Kevin Boone, CSX executive vice president and chief commercial officer, in a LinkedIn post.

Executives at BNSF, CSX, CN, and Canadian Pacific Kansas City have all stated they prefer alliances over mergers, arguing these cooperative arrangements bring immediate benefits while avoiding the risks of integration.

UP and NS Push Back

UP CEO Jim Vena countered that while alliances may offer short-term gains, they are not as durable or transformative as mergers. “Bottom line is this: A cooperation agreement is completely different than a consolidation,” he said. “There are way more benefits on a consolidation, on a merger, than there ever is on an agreement where you’re going to work together.”

Vena also noted that interline agreements often collapse under operational strain. “If you’re short locomotives or tight for people, you have to set the priority, and you’re going to look inward. So that’s why they always break down.”

George compared the UP–NS merger to President Dwight Eisenhower’s creation of the Interstate Highway System in 1956, calling it a chance to “redefine rail’s role in freight transportation.”

The Road Ahead

The merger application, expected to exceed 4,000 pages, will be submitted to the Surface Transportation Board after October 29. STB rules require that major mergers enhance competition rather than simply preserve it, a standard UP and NS say their proposal will meet.

Both executives said feedback from shippers and labor has been largely positive, despite some opposition from industry groups concerned about service disruptions and reduced options. Shareholder approval is also required, with NS aiming to hold a vote by year’s end.

Vena added that UP has discussed the merger with senior Trump administration officials. “They get it. They understand the value of what we’re proposing, and they think it’s an absolute win for the country.”

Source: FreightWaves | CSX/LinkedIn


Great! You’ve successfully signed up.

Welcome back! You've successfully signed in.

You've successfully subscribed to FreightCaviar.

Success! Check your email for magic link to sign-in.

Success! Your billing info has been updated.

Your billing was not updated.